MatchThem:: Matching and Weighting after Multiple Imputation

نویسندگان

چکیده

Balancing the distributions of confounders across exposure levels in an observational study through matching or weighting is accepted method to control for confounding due these variables when estimating association between and outcome reduce degree dependence on certain modeling assumptions. Despite increasing popularity practice, procedures cannot be immediately applied datasets with missing values. Multiple imputation data a popular approach account values while preserving number units dataset accounting uncertainty However, best our knowledge, there no comprehensive software that can easily implemented multiply imputed datasets. In this paper, we review problem suggest framework map out 5 actions as well practices assess balance after weighting. We also illustrate approaches using companion package R, MatchThem.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting

Two approaches commonly used to deal with missing data are multiple imputation (MI) and inverse-probability weighting (IPW). IPW is also used to adjust for unequal sampling fractions. MI is generally more efficient than IPW but more complex. Whereas IPW requires only a model for the probability that an individual has complete data (a univariate outcome), MI needs a model for the joint distribut...

متن کامل

Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation

BACKGROUND Multiple imputation (MI) is a well-recognised statistical technique for handling missing data. As usually implemented in standard statistical software, MI assumes that data are 'Missing at random' (MAR); an assumption that in many settings is implausible. It is not possible to distinguish whether data are MAR or 'Missing not at random' (MNAR) using the observed data, so it is desirab...

متن کامل

Weighting Imputation for Categorical Data

LVQ (Learning Vector Quantization) has been used to impute missing group membership and stratum weights in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model with continuous indicators (Chen, Tsai, & Yang, 2010; Tsai & Yang, 2012). Currently, categorical questionnaires (e.g., Binary and Likert-type items) are widely used in education, business, economy, and psychology tests as well as international large...

متن کامل

Re-analysis using Inverse Probability Weighting and Multiple Imputation of Data from the Southampton Women’s Survey

In this document I describe a re-analysis of data from the Southampton Women’s Survey (SWS). The original complete-case analysis implicitly assumed that the data are missing completely at random. Inverse-probability weighting (IPW) and multiple imputation (MI) are more sophisticated methods for handling missing data, which make the weaker assumption that the data are missing at random. We sough...

متن کامل

Missing confounding data in marginal structural models: a comparison of inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation.

Standard statistical analyses of observational data often exclude valuable information from individuals with incomplete measurements. This may lead to biased estimates of the treatment effect and loss of precision. The issue of missing data for inverse probability of treatment weighted estimation of marginal structural models (MSMs) has often been addressed, though little has been done to compa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: R Journal

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2073-4859']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2021-073